This article was originally published in Clutch.co
Despite technological advancements making software development outsourcing more efficient and easier than ever, human factors still require the most attention for successful engagements.
For companies looking to build cutting edge technologies and launch state-of-the-art applications and platforms, outsourcing software development has never been easier. In fact, among large companies, the average percentage allocated to outsourcing in IT budgets rose in 2018. While more advanced technologies, cloud capabilities, and collaboration tools continue to evolve to make transnational software development viable, human factors may still present the greatest challenge to outsourced engagements.
PSL, a leading software development outsourcing company in Latin America, has worked with North American clients for more than fifteen years. These experiences have allowed us to become familiar with the many communication and interaction nuances that come up when working with different cultures and gather tips for overcoming cultural barriers and ensuring smooth communications in outsourced software development engagements.
It's unwise to assume that effective intercultural communications boil down to emails or daily stand up meetings through video calls. As one failed interaction leads to another, teams facing completely blocked communication channels or broken pipelines usually have little understanding of where misunderstandings began in the first place. Though not entirely conscious, cross-cultural teams are set against sharp contrasts in fields spanning from hierarchy, individuality, long-term orientation, and depending on how similar or different they are in these respects, communication can be smooth or strained which can directly affect trust among the team.
For example, when comparing the cultural values of Colombia to those of the US according to Hofstede's 6-D Model, we can see a few dimensions in which both cultures are very similar, but a couple in which they vary radically.
While similar in terms of masculinity and indulgence, Colombia and the US have a deep contrast in terms of individuality. Meaning that for Colombians, belonging to a tight-knit circle is much more important than it is for Americans. However, while frameworks such as Hofstede's may help inform country-specific traits, values held on a more personal or corporate level can vary. To understand how communication in specific outsourcing engagements can be affected, you may need to take a closer look at organizational values.Leaders can take certain steps toward ensuring successful collaboration with their outsourced development team by keeping the following tips in mind:
When creating a highly-complex, knowledge-based product, the human element is, at least, half of the challenge. Differences in values, mannerisms, and communication styles between in-house and deployed teams will undoubtedly impact the dynamics and interactions. Therefore, being aware and sensitive to these cultural aspects is essential to achieving effective cross-cultural alignment. By understanding the cultural background of a deployed team, you will be able to anticipate and mitigate risks, as well as plan better to play to their strengths.Along with Hofstede's model, Edward T. Hall's Theory of Cultural Factors may offer some insights into the communication styles of high and low context cultures, as seen below.
For example, in a high-context culture, where hierarchy and protocol are highly valued, communication will often take a deductive route, and include very broad or detailed explanations before arriving at a point. To a low-context culture, where conciseness and direct communication is far more valuable, this may be frustrating or even rude. In these cases, leaders can act as bridges between a high-context deployed team and an internal one. They may also try to sensitize vendors to issues related to hierarchical structures in order to promote participation from everyone on the team, even junior professionals. And above all, leaders must do their homework and find out what makes their outsourced team's culture unique.
The next step to achieving effective outsourcing collaboration is getting to know your counterpart's style of communication. Even within in-house teams, communication can be difficult, and in software development, miscommunication can be costly, to say the least. Things like gestures or a certain way of speaking can influence the way one team sees the other, which can either support or hinder cooperation. So, small things like greetings in emails, or misconstrued interpretations of deadlines can result in awkwardness or discomfort.
US companies may find communication with high-context cultures, whose nature is reserved and inexpressive, awkward. For American teams, this reservation may foster feelings that their deployed team isn't fully engaged in the project and only responding affirmatively to everything. In these cases, establishing a set of ground rules and dynamics where every member of team—deployed or in-house—can and should speak up, ask questions and take part of a healthy debate, ensures decisions are made together and both sides can take advantage of the experience, know-how, and skills of everyone on the team.
Ultimately, good collaboration can only be achieved when the relationship between a client and an outsourced software team is based on trust. In software development, trust is expressed when one side believes in the other's capabilities, know-how and that they will do the right thing ethically speaking.
A way for teams to create stronger bonds is to encourage them to build rapport and learn about each other. This can be supported by in-person visits that allow team members to meet face to face and get to know each other better. At PSL, clients often visit their outsourced team or have some team members visit them onsite for a kickoff where key everyone works together face to face, establishing a strong relationship from the start.
For software development, misunderstandings can easily be avoided by having an established methodology or set of processes both outsourced and in-house teams agree on. Sharing a way of doing things puts everyone on the same page, establishes a roadmap for goals and expectations, and lays down some ground rules, so to speak. Agile development, especially, has been shown to help build confidence through transparent and frequent progress reports.
Agile is a good starting point for teams to establish some common ground, but it's vital to for companies to first understand their deployed team's culture and leverage this information to better manage their team. For instance, cultures with a very high uncertainty avoidance index (like some Eastern European countries) may expect the client to make decisions faster than the client may want to or not to pivot the product mid-flight in order to feel comfortable in an engagement. While this may clash with agile, leaders with high intercultural intelligence (ICI) can find ways to adapt to these cultural subtleties and still get the most out of their agile process and team.
While some cultures may favor overtime work due to a strong sense of collectivism, as explained through Hofstede's model, an outsourcing engagement should be made to last. So, valuing your outsourced team's health and well-being, as well as respecting their religious and national holidays, will result in greater productivity in the long run.
Comprehensive planning that takes into account release schedules, product complexity and functionality, team size and capacity, and considers any challeng